Grahakjago (S.K.Virmani)©

An article titled " Please be careful if you plan to deal with "Aapka Roozgaar Services Pvt. Ltd., Noida" was brought on this blog on 29/04/2014. There were many complaints being received against them as well as many people have brought out their modus-operandii on the public domain. Department of Consumer Affairs, Govt. of India vide their letter No. 9138/JS(CA)/2014 dtd. 26th June 2014 have requested Police Commissioner, Delhi Police to register FIR against the above company. A scanned copy of the said letter is posted here for the benefit of the public. Whosoever feels cheated by Aapka Roozgaar Services Pvt. Ltd. may like to report the matter with the Police Commissioner of their state and can attach the copy of the above letter with their complaint.

  Can CIC be biased? Is it possible? I have been raising a RTI since last more than two years against Delhi Police. Delhi Police have been supplying false information and some of the crucial information which could have substantiated the claims of a possible nexus, have been suppressed by Delhi Police. There was a hearing before CIC (Chief Information Commission) wherein I could beyond reasonable doubt prove that Delhi Police is supplying false information and have been suppressing information of crucial nature. I concluded my view point with a request to direct Delhi Police to state the facts on an affidavit. Delhi Police refused to supply the statement of information on Affidavit.  Surprisingly the CIC order does not specify such request made by me as an Appellant. What could be the reason of suppression of such statements of the Appellant by CIC. Could it be possible CIC being biased. I do not believe but it is also a fact that it is a real based factual statement...