- Cancellation fee/ ticket rescheduling charges. The cancellation fee or rescheduling charges need to be charged either as %age of the ticket basic fare or a nominal fixed amount not more than the basic fare. In our considered opinion, the same could be restricted to 10% of the basic fare if it is cancelled / rescheduled more than 48 hrs before the scheduled departure and not to exceed 50% if cancelled within 48 hrs to 8 hrs before the scheduled departure. In case the passenger cancels the ticket less than 8 hrs prior to the scheduled departure, the cancellation fee may not exceed the basic fare with refund of all other charges other than basic fare. Similarly in our considered opinion, the rescheduling charges may be capped at Rs. 500/- per ticket.
2. Removal of preferential seat allocation fee.
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) must regulate cancellation fee/ rescheduling fee,preferential seat allocation fee being charged by Airlines
Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) need to intervene and frame out policy on cancellation fee chargeable by the Airlines and to withdraw the practice of charging for preferential seat allocation
Recently a ticket booked for Delhi- Ahmedabad-Delhi on 2nd February 2018 for scheduled Departure on 25th February 2018 and scheduled return journey on 28th February 2018 was required to be cancelled on 22nd February 2018. Surprisingly, the amount of refund by the intended passenger as received was merely Rs. 493/- out of the paid amount of Rs. 6,243/- deducting an amount of Rs. 5,750/- supposedly to be the cancellation fee.
Amount deducted: Rs. 5,750
Amount refunded: Rs. 493
With such a high amount being deducted towards cancellation fee, there is a need for intervention of DGCA appropriately to regulate the cancellation fee being deducted by the Airlines and the agents.
The Airlines are in the transport business of carrying the passengers and thus logically the charges or the fare need to be charged only when the passenger is availing the transport services. Transport services are the main area of the Airlines business and hence the income needs to be only out of transport services. In the instant case the passenger has paid an amount of Rs. 5,750/- without even availing the transport services of the Airlines thus violating the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. As per basic principles of Consumerism, the consumer is required to pay the charges for availing the services. In the present case, the passenger would have paid an amount of Rs. 6,243/- for travelling to Delhi- Ahmedabad- Delhi but has paid an amount of Rs. 5,750/- without even travelling or using any other services of the Airlines, Airport etc. The break up of the ticket fare as shown in the ticket was
Basic fare : Rs. 5,287
Taxes and other charges : Rs. 956
While the basic fare was Rs. 5,287/-, the cancellation fee paid by the passenger who has not neither travelled nor utilised any iota of services is Rs. 5,750/-. Had he travelled and utilised the services of Airlines and Airport, he would have paid Rs. 5,287/- but by not travelling, he has paid Rs. 5,750/- . The cancellation fee in the present case comes to 109% of the airline fare and 92% of the total ticket cost. It seems to be highly illogical and could be even termed as unprofessional/ unfair business practices. There is an urgent need for its rationalisation.
As per CAR SECTION 3 – AIR TRANSPORT SERIES ‘M’, PART II ISSUE I, DATED 22 May, 2008 ,
“ (d) Airlines shall necessarily return the PSF collected by them from the passengers on non-utilization/ cancellation of tickets.
(e) Airlines shall refund any charges such as congestion charge, fuel surcharge etc., along with the refund of the ticket, unless these are clubbed with basic fares.”
Same CAR effective 1st August 2016 also states:
“The airlines shall refund all statutory taxes and User Development Fee (UDF)/Airport Development Fee (ADF)/Passenger Service Fee (PSF) to the passengers in case of cancellation/non-utilisation of tickets/no show. This provision shall also be applicable for all types of fares offered including promos/special fares and where the basic fare is non-refundable.”
It further states that “Under no circumstances, the airline shall levy cancellation charge more than the basic fare plus fuel surcharge. i) The airlines shall not levy any additional charge to process the refund.”
Even for the time being keeping aside the ethics of professional business practices, in the instant case, the Airline should have refunded at least an amount of Rs. 956/- instead of Rs. 493/-.
The intended passenger had also petitioned the issue on a Local Circle Community to seek the public reaction and looking at the comments of the public being the perspective consumers of Airlines, the situation seems to be indicative of unprofessionalism prevailing in the Airlines sector. The Airlines have now even started charging an additional amount as preferential seat allocation fee. The preferential seat allocation charges being charged by the Airlines put inconvenience to two or more passengers travelling together or may be wife and husband or the senior citizens travelling with their younger ones as when checked in without paying any preferential seat allocation fee shall be are seated in the different middle rows of the seats thus making them feel uncomfortable throughout the entire journey specially when the ladies are carrying their minor children with them. Having fare been charged from the passengers, the charging of fee for preferential seat become of unethical business practices. Further it has also been reported by one of the person that the fare between Delhi- Chandigarh by Jet Airways was less than the cancellation fee. The ticket cost has been indicated as Rs. 2,403/- and the cancellation fee as Rs. 3,900/-. Most of the comments from the intellectual members on the Local Circle Community have opined for immediate intervention of DGCA, the Regulatory Authority for Airlines Sector to rationalise the amount of fee towards cancellation/ rescheduling fee and removal of preferential seat allocation fee. However, there is also a need to simplify the nomenclature being used by Airlines in charging the fee under different heads as different airlines are using different nomenclature.
In view of the above, there is a necessity for intervention of DGCA appropriately in rationalising the