Posts

Showing posts from November, 2013

Is it Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG cylinder in tune to what is being projected to the Public or is to befool them?

Image
Is it Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG cylinder in tune to what is being projected to the Public or is to befool them?                                                                                                                             Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Govt. of India brought out a scheme of Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG cylinders which is being reproduced what is stated on their web-site http://www.petroleum.nic.in/dbtl/ "Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG consumer (DBTL) is the scheme aimed to improve the subsidy administration of LPG across the country. As per this scheme an LPG consumer will get his/her cylinder at full market price and the differential between subsidized price and full market price i.e. the subsidy will be transferred to his/her bank account upto a capped limit(9 cylinders in a year) " As in the past Govt. was selling the LPG cylinders under subsidised scheme which later on was withdrawn

Surveyor’s Report on the assessment of loss is not the final and deduction on account of Excess Clause is not valid if the policy holder has not been supplied policy terms and conditions.

Image
Surveyor’s Report on the assessment of loss is not the final and deduction on account of Excess Clause is not valid if the policy holder has not been supplied policy terms and conditions.   National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in the judgement passed in a case of Uni Ply Industries vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. on 16 th July 2013 upheld the findings of State Commission. The Insurance Company had filed the revision petition No. 342 of 2013 (a gainst the concurrent finding of both the District Consumer Forum and State Commission holding the insurance company liable for deficiency in service in terms of the impugned order passed on 10.10.2012 by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula in FA No.441/2008.  By its order, the State Commission dismissed the appeal of the petitioner Co. and upheld the order dated 3.1.2008 passed by the District Forum, Yamuna Nagar in consumer complaint No.1115 of 2007. The District Forum had a